OnLine Store
Issue: 875 Date: 5/31/2007

µØ¸Ç¬ü°ê¤H ¦Ê¦~·É®á ²¾¥ÁªùÂe¦A«×³]­­
½Ð¦V°ê·|°Ñij­û¤ÏÀ³ ¤Ï¹ï¡u¨ú®ø¿ËÄݲ¾¥Á¡v´£®×
Joint Statement-Stop eliminating family reunion immigration categories

µØ¸Ç¬ü°ê¤H ¦Ê¦~·É®á
        ¡i®É³ø°T¡j¦Û19 ¥@¬ö¶}©lµØ¤H²¾¥Á¨Ó¬ü¡A¥R·íÅK¸ô¤u¤H¡Bª÷¤s±¸Äq¡B¹¡¨ü¦U¶µ²¾¥Á§Áµø¤£¥­µ¥¹ï«Ý¡A¦Ê¦~·É®á¤§«á¡A21¥@¬öªº¤µ¤Ñ¡A¬ü°ê°ê·|¤SÁ߯C¨ú®ø¿ËÄݲ¾¥Áªk®×¡A­é¹Ü¬ü°ê¤½¥Á¾á«O¦Û¤v21·³¥H¤W¥~Äy¦¨¦~¤l¤k¨Ó¬ü°ê¹Î»E¤§Åv§Q¡A­é¹Ü¬ü°ê¤½¥Á¾á«O¦Û¤vªº¥S§Ì©n©f¨Ó¬ü¤§Åv§Q¡A³o¬O¤@¶µ¹H¤Ï¬ü°ê¤H¥Á­«µø®a®x»ù­È¡A¹H¤Ï²¾¥ÁÅv¯q¤§ªk®×¡A¥þ¬ü¦U¦aºûÅ@²¾¥ÁÅv¯q¹ÎÅé¯É¯É¥M¸qª½¨¥¡A¤jÁn¯e©I¤Ï¹ï³o¶µÄ³®×¡A®É³ø¥»´Á¯S§O¥Z¥X¬ü°ê80-20«P¶i·|©Ò·Ç³Æ¤§­P¬ü°ê°Ñij­û¡A¤Ï¹ï³o¶µªk®×¤§¤½¶}«H¤¤­^¤åª©¡A©IÆ~µØ¸Ç²¾¥Á¥´¹q¸Ü©Î¼g«Hµ¹±z¿ï°Ï©Ò¿ï¥X¤§°Ñij­û¡Aªí¹F¤Ï¹ï§Üij¤§Án¡C

        ¤£¦ý¿ËÄݲ¾¥ÁÅv¯q¾D¨ì­é¹Ü¡A¾Ú±KĬ¨½¦{«ß®v¨ó·|ªí¥Ü¡A²¾¥ÁÂk¤Æ¤½¥Á±o¸g¹L²¾¥Á§½ªº­±¸Õ¡A¦Ó­±¸ÕªºÃD¥Ø·U¨Ó·UÃø¡A±K¦{«ß®v¨ó·|¬Æ¦Ü·Ç³Æ¤F¤T®M¡A¨C®M¦U10ÃDªº²¾¥ÁÂk¤Æ°ÝÃD¼ÒÀÀ¸Õ¨÷¡A¨Ó¸Õ¸Õ¬Ý¬ü°ê¤H¯à§_³q¹L³o¼Ëªº¦Ò¸Õ¡A®É³ø¨ú±o³o¤T®M¸Õ¨÷ÃD®w¡A±N¦Û¥»´Á°_¤À¤T¶g±N¤T®M¸ÕÃD¥Zµn¦b­^¤åª©¤W¨Ãªþ¤Wµª®×¡AŪªÌ¥i¥H¸Õ¸Õ¦Û¤vªº¤½¥Áª¾ÃÑ¡A¥H¬°À³¥I¤é¯q§xÃøªº¤½¥Á¤JÄy¦Ò¸Õ¡C

        ¨Æ¹ê¤W¡A¦Û1965¦~°_¡A¬ü°êÅé»{¨ì¤½¥Á®ü¥~®a®x¹Î»Eªº­«­n©Ê¦Ó­ã³\¤½¥Á¾á«O®a®x¦¨­û²¾¥Á¨Ó¬ü¡A¦ý¬O³Ìªñ²¾¥ÁªùÂe·U¨Ó·UÄY¡A¤µ¦~¤T¤ë¤@¶µ¥Ñ¤@¤p³¡¥÷¥Á¥DÄÒ©M¦@©MÄÒ°Ñij­û³s¸p¤§¤Ï¿ËÄݲ¾¥Áªk®×¡A¤£¦ý¿ËÄݲ¾¥Á¾D­é¹Ü¡A¦Û2005¦~5¤ë1¤é¥H«á¥Ó½Ð¨Ã¤wú¶O¤§¿ËÄݲ¾¥Á¾á«O§ó±N·|³Q¨ú®ø¡A±N¨Ó¾á«O¤÷¥À¿Ë¨Ó¬ü¤§µ¥­Ô´Á¤]·|©µªø¡C

        ¿ËÄݲ¾¥ÁÃþ§O¦b²¾¥Áªk¤¤¤w¦s¦b42¦~¡A²{¦b«o­±Á{³Q¨ú®øªº©R¹B¡A¼vÅT²¾¥ÁÅv¯q¬Æ¥¨¡A²¾¥Á¦P­MÀ³®¼¨­¦Ó¥X¡Aµo¥X±j¯P¤Ï¹ïÁn­µ¡A¥H«O»Ù²¾¥ÁÅv¯q©M´L­«®a®x»ù­È¡C

        80-20«P¶i·|©Ò·Ç³Æ¤§­P°Ñij­û­^¤å«H¤Î¤¤¤å½Ķ¦p¤U¡G

        ­P¦U¦ì°Ñij­û¡R

        Å³¤_·í«e°Ñij°|´£¥Xªº²¾¥Áªk®×¤º®e¤í§´¡A§Ú­Ìñ¸p³o¥÷½ÐÄ@®Ñ¡C¦¹¶µªk®×¹H­I¤F¬ü°ê¤H¥Á¬Ãµø®a®xªº®Ö¤ß»ù­ÈÆ[¡A¨Ã±Nª½±µ¾É­P¡R

        1¡^­é¹Ü¬ü°ê¤½¥Á¾á«O¦Û¤v21·³¥H¤W¥~Äy¦¨¦~¤l¤kªºÅv§Q¡F2¡^¸T¤î¬ü°ê¤½¥Á¾á«O¦Û¤vªº¥S§Ì©j©f¡F3¡^§Y¨Ï¬O¤÷¥À¡A¨C¦~ªº¦WÃB´î¬°¥b¼Æ¡F4¡^ªñ¨â¦~¤º´£¥æªº¾á«O¥Ó½Ð§Y±N§@¼o

        ½Ð°Ý¥H°Ñij°|ªº°ª¨£¡A¦pªG­n³Q­¢»P¿Ë¤H¥Ã¤[ªº¤ÀÂ÷¡A¨º¨ÇªÀ·|µo®i©Ò»Ý­nªº°ª¯Å¤H¤~ÁÙ·|ªYµM²¾¥Á¬ü°ê¶Ü¡H ³]¨­³B¦a·Q¤@·Q¡A´L·qªº°Ñij­û¡A¦pªG§A¥Ø«e¤£¬O¤@¦ì¬ü°ê¤½¥Á©Î¥Ã¤[©~¥Á¡A§AÁÙ·|¦Ò¼{²¾¥Á¬ü°ê¶Ü¡H

        ¦b¦¹¡A§Ú­ÌÀµ½Ð°Ñij°|«O¯d¨º¨ÇÅý²¾¥Á®a®x¹Î»Eªº¬Fµ¦¡C 2008¦~Á`²Î¿ïÁ|¦b§Y¡A§Ú­Ì¦b§ë²¼®É±N·|·V­«¦Ò¼{¦U¦ì¦b³o¶µ·s²¾¥Áªk®×ªº¥ß³õ¡C

        To: Members of the U.S. Senate

        We, the Undersigned, feel that the current Senate ImmigrationBill has serious defects. The American core value of family is violated.This bill will

        1) strip American citizens of their ability to sponsor any childwho has reached the age of 21,2) bar citizens from ever sponsoring their siblings,3) cut the quota for parents by half, and4) cancel sponsorship applications that American citizens havealready filed and paid for over the past two years.

        Is the Senate of the wisdom that highly talented and skilledpeople will come to a USA that forces them to be separated fromtheir families permanently? Will you, Senators, come to Americaunder such conditions, if you were not US residents and citizenscurrently?

        Please DO NOT eliminate family reunion categories. In the 2008 election, we will weigh your stands on this issue heavily when casting our ballots.

        Respectfully,



        Joint Statement-Stop eliminating family reunion immigration categories

        By 80-20 Initiative, Inc., Asian Law Caucus, Chinese for Affirmative Action, Chinese Progressive Association, Organization for Justice & Equality, Traditional Family Coalition

        The U.S. Senate is in the midst of an unprecedented attack on the basic rights of American citizens with close family members overseas. Since 1965, the law has recognized the importance and integrity of families and has given citizens the right to sponsor a limited number of family members' immigration, in most cases after a lengthy waiting period. But the Senate is now discussing whether to strip American citizens of their ability to sponsor any child who has reached age 21, and whether to bar citizens from ever sponsoring their siblings.

        This proposal, which originated in the White House in March and was fleshed out in secretive negotiations by a small group of Republican and Democratic senators, would sacrifice the rights of millions of American citizens in order to reach an unprincipled political compromise on a deeply flawed immigration bill.

        Not only does the proposal seek to eliminate most of the existing categories of family reunification, it would unfairly do so retroactively by canceling sponsorship applications that American citizens have already filed and paid for over the past two years, since May 1, 2005. It would also introduce a lengthy waiting period for citizens sponsoring their own parents.

        As Americans who remember and respect our immigrant roots, we strenuously protest this ill-conceived proposal that utterly disregards the contributions that immigrant families have made to this country throughout its history. It makes a mockery of the family values that we cherish and uphold.

        Under the Senate proposal, the family-based categories in place for the last 42 years would largely be replaced by a point system that would award points for English fluency, education, and advanced technical skills. Its authors insist that this will allow America to attract top talent from around the world. But instead of attracting talent, the new system will cause our country to lose its unique advantage in the global market for highly skilled workers. Many countries, such as Canada, already have a point system. If we abandon America's enduring focus on family, fewer talented and educated people will want to come to or stay in a country that forces them to be separated from their family permanently.

        The point system has other major flaws: its focus on English fluency disproportionately rewards citizens of former British colonies, while penalizing those born in countries that avoided colonization. It represents a return to the racist national-origin quota system established in the 1920s, which sought to restrict immigration to citizens of a few select countries in Western Europe.

        The point system's intense focus on highly trained workers is also strongly reminiscent of the Chinese Exclusion Act's 1882 ban on immigration by anyone born in China other than “merchants,?a barrier that lasted almost six decades and wasn't fully dismantled until the civil rights era. Now the modern immigration system established in 1965, which finally put immigrants from all countries on an equal footing, is under attack.

        It is the modern immigration system of the last four decades that has built the foundation of our Asian American community, a community that pays billions of dollars in taxes every year, founds and operates hundreds of thousands of businesses large and small, and employs millions of people across the country. Many of these businesses were started by pooling family financial resources and labor, and would not have been possible without the joint effort of several family members working together.

        Opponents of family sponsorship disingenuously argue that these immigrants are a drain on government resources. In fact, for over a decade the law has required that American citizens sponsoring a family member's immigration must sign a binding legal agreement to provide long-term financial support to their relative, and must prove that they have enough income and assets to uphold this obligation. Current law thus already carefully regulates and limits family immigration and ensures that there is adequate support available before a person can immigrate.

        American citizens deserve better than backroom deals that betray decades of pro-family policy. Asian Americans and other proud naturalized citizens have worked hard to make America a better place. We strongly urge legislators to abandon this effort to eliminate family immigration categories, and we will not forget those in Congress of either party who vote to deny Americans our cherished right to reunite with our families. We urge all Americans to voice your strong objections to this inhumane, unjust, and anti-family proposal and its devastating consequences, and to act for the betterment of American families and our country itself by immediately contacting the Senators.

 
²¾¥Á¥»¨­­n¬°ª§¨ú²¾¥ÁÅv¯q¦ÓµoÁn ²¾¥Á¥»¨­­n¬°ª§¨ú²¾¥ÁÅv¯q¦ÓµoÁn
 
±ÆµØªk®×1882¦~³q¹L¹ê¬I¡A³o¬O¬ü°ê­º¦¸¥H±Ú¸Ç©Î°êÄy¬°¥Ñ±Æ°£²¾¥Á µØ¸Ç²¾¥Á¦b¤Ñ¨Ï®q±µ¨ü¸ß°Ý
 
µØ¸Ç²¾¥Á¦Û¤Ñ¨Ï®qµn³°«á­º¥ý±o±µ¨üÅéÀË µØ¸Ç°ü¤k©M¨àµ£¦b¤Ñ¨Ï®q²¾¥Á¯¸µ¥­Ô
 
19¥@¬ö¦­´ÁµØ¤u²¾¥Á¨ì¬ü°ê¡A­×¿v³e¬ïªF¦è¨â©¤¤§ÅK¸ô 19¥@¬ö¦­´ÁµØ¤u²¾¥Á¨ì¬ü°ê¡A­×¿v³e¬ïªF¦è¨â©¤¤§ÅK¸ô
 
1965¦~¸â´ËÁ`²Îñ¸p²¾¥Áªk®×¡A­ã³\¨È¸Ç²¾¥Á°tÃB¨î«× 1965¦~¸â´ËÁ`²Îñ¸p²¾¥Áªk®×¡A­ã³\¨È¸Ç²¾¥Á°tÃB¨î«×
 
THE CHINESE EXCLUSION ACT HANDBILL The Chinese Exclusion Act passed in 1882 marks the first time that the United States banned any group of people based on race or nationality. This handbill for a public rally celebrates with the words "Hip! Hoorah! The White Man Is On Top!"
 
Credit: British Columbia Archives ANGEL ISLAND MEDICAL INSPECTIONS
 
Chinese immigrants arrived at Angel Island Immigration Station in San Francisco hoping to enter the United States, but had to go through a gauntlet of processing. The first step was a medical exam. Credit: California State Department of Parks and Recreations
ANGEL ISLAND INTERROGATION



discuss
Please click here to comment on this article

Space Privacy Policy ®É³ø´L­«±zªºÅv¯q